This High-Tech Custom rifle comes in handy in the African bush and beyond.

Story and photos by Lee J. Hoots

I suppose I'm not quite old enough to truly appreciate or understand the influence Jack O'Connor had on the popularity of the .270 Winchester cartridge. He died in 1978-1 was 10, still two years away from receiving my first hunting license. And I was far too young to even consider a career in outdoor publishing, writing and editing gun and hunting stories, which would lead me down some of the same hallways through which O'Connor once strolled. But I am thankful that O'Connor's words helped drive widespread interest in the .270. It is unquestionably one of America's favorite biggame cartridges, and I count myself as a serious fan. Over the years, I've shot many and owned several rifles chambered in the cartridge. Some of them shot very well, but I never hung on to them very long, believing that none of those rifles had everything I wanted. But that all changed three years ago during an NRA convention as I chatted with riflesmith Rich Reiley.

Reiley operates High-Tech Custom Rifles (Dept. RS, 3109 North Cascade, Suite 102, Colorado Springs, CO 80907; 719/667- 1090; 0www.htcustoms.com) in Colorado Springs, Colorado, and had just finished building me a .243 predator rifle, which he had in his display at the convention. When I had fondled the rifle long enough and set it back in his display rack, a thin little stainless sporter caught my eye. "What's this?" I asked, reaching for the black synthetic stock. "You didn't see that? That's a little .270, and I think I've got it sold," Reiley told me. "That's too bad," I said, having noticed its 24-inch barrel, narrow fore-end and grip. "This is exactly the kind of .270 I've been looking for. Lean and handsome. Does it shoot?" "You know better than that," Reiley replied. I shouldered the rifle, cycled the bolt to check the chamber and dropped the three-pound trigger. Clean and crisp. I knew I had asked a foolish question and put the rifle back in the rack. "I'll see ya, Rich. I gotta get back to work," I said. "Talk to ya later." The following week I got a phone call. "Hoots." It was Reiley. "Aren't you going to Africa in a few months?" he asked. "What are you takin' ?" "A .338," I replied. "You know that .270 you were ogling at NRA? I want you to take it with you," he said. "I thought you sold that gun," I said. "I did. I sold it to you. You'll get it via FedEx next week. I want you to put it to good use in Africa," Reiley told me. I tried to ask him how much he was asking, but he cut me off mid-sentence. "We'll work that out later," I was told. "And I'm sending you some handloads." ''But. .. " Then he hung up on me.

The handloads arrived first, the same day I got a phone message from Reiley: "Hoots. Did you get the handloads? Bill Hober said you should be happy with the bullet performance. I've seen a lot of guys use them on elk with excellent penetration." Bill Hober owns Swift Bullet Company, and the handloads were fitted with ISO-grain Swift A-Frames. A few years ago, when Reiley became disenchanted with running a machine shop, he began spending more and more time working on old rifles for clients and building new ones when there was time. He also began guiding for elk outfitters in Colorado and eventually for brown bear outfitters in Alaska. Naturally, he shoots quite a bit and spends several weeks a year putting clients to within range of some of this country's largest game animals. He's developed quite an attachment to the A-Frame (actually, he prefers a 140 for general use in the .270), and I shouldn't have expected the handloads to contain any other bullet. The rifle came two days later, every bit of it "all business," just as I remembered. Like many custom rifles offered today, this one is built on a stainless Remington Model 700 action with all the care and detail that any fine rifle should receive. The recoil lug and receiver face are true and square to the bore axis. The bolt is made to slide along its lapped raceways smoothly, its twin lugs locking tight to the receiver in complete contact. The bolt shank, too, is elegantly fluted in a spiral pattern along its length. While this last feature is not all that uncommon anymore, the real benefit is not widely revealed. Depending on your taste, bolt-shank fluting is mainly a cosmetic enhancement. There are some gunmakers who tout such a feature as allowing the bolt the ability to clean itself as you cycle the rifle. I suppose flutes could carry dirt away from the receiver but with no greater ability than they have to carry dirt right into the trigger mechanism. If you have that much dirt gummed up in your rifle, you need to take it down and clean it anyway, fluted or not. What the fluting does offer, however, is less bearing surface between the bolt shank and the receiver housing. This is indeed beneficial. As you slide the bolt to the rear of the receiver, a fluted bolt will cause less friction between the two parts, therefore providing a smoother, seemingly effortless bolt stroke. I like this feature, and I happen to think the fluted bolt shank looks good, too. Unlike most accurized or custom rifles built on the Model 700, Reiley likes to modify both the front end and the rear end. Remington safeties are fine-"on" and "off'-but High-Tech guns feature a unique little enhancement. It comes in the way of a three-position safety that Reiley has been installing on 700s for about five years now. "It's the old Mauser style," he says about the New England Custom Guns version he uses. It's a color-cased unit that is both functional and attractive. "And it locks the firing pin, not the trigger sear, which is a great safety device," says Reiley. I've always been a three-position safety fan, and this one certainly adds a touch of class to an already attractive rifle. The bolt face on any Model 700 that comes out of the High-Tech shop also has been enhanced to include a large Sako-style extractor, especially on rifles chambered to dangerous-game calibers. Like the three-position safety, the oversize extractor is an added touch that beefs up the reliability factor of the rifles Reiley builds. Now, I've never had a Model 700 fail to extract, but according to Reiley, there's no point in building it any other way. Mated to the .270's slickedup action is a 24-inch Lilja barrel with a very slender taper measuring .610 inch at the muzzle, where a two-step crown protects the standard I: 10 rifling. The matte-stainless metal rides in great contrast in a textured black Rimrock stock. At one time Rimrock stocks were built in the Pacific Northwest. Today they're built by Jim Borden of Borden Rifles in Springville, Pennsylvania. Borden, an accomplished competitive rifleman, is a mechanical engineer who quit his job in 1994 to build rifles full time. These fiberglass stocks are of the highest quality and durability and are available to fit most popular action types. With its graceful and classic lines, narrow fore-end and grip, the High-Tech .270's stock is what first attracted me to the rifle at the NRA convention. The barreled action is glass bedded which Reiley has executed perfectly. No gaps or gouges-every line is smooth and snug. With a 3-9X Nikon Monarch UCC scope and Talley rings and mounts attached, the rifle weighs seven pounds, two ounces.

You can imagine that I was eager to find out if the rifle shot as well as it looked. I shouldn't have worried. The A-Frame handloads containing 57 grains of Reloder 22 shot well under an inch with ordinary regularity. And with the 24-inch barrel, muzzle velocity hovered right around 2,893 fps. So off to the Dark Continent I went. Though I'm a big .270 Winchester fan, it isn't a caliber I would ordinarily think of when it comes to hunting in Africa. Osmosis, I suppose, had led me to believe that bigger is better in Africa. And having now been there twice, I can certainly tell you that most of the time, it is. Thirty caliber and up is what most African Professional Hunters recommend for plains game, and my choice in a .338 was a perfect one. But so was the .270. The dreamy African animals-like gemsbok, zebra and eland-are big and tough. But some of the smaller or more fragile animals such as impalas and even kudu don't demand the use of a fat bullet. In all actuality, with a ISO-grain A-Frame, even wildebeest and gemsbok can be taken cleanly with a well-placed .270 bullet. But I ended up taking both rifles to South Africa, and I decided to swap them out from time to time, knowing that the .338 was more than enough for anything I wanted to shoot and the .270 would still work if I placed my shots accordingly.

As it turned out, on the days that I carried the .270, it was the smaller animals that provided shot opportunities. The first was a very large, old impala ram that I shot at something like 100 yards at a fairly steep downhill angle. The old ram, with horns worn short by age, took one bullet quartering away. The A-Frame clipped one lung, and the ram required a followup shot-both bullets penetrated completely. The second impala was shot broadside, square behind the shoulder, at a distance of about 65 yards. That ram ran probably 30 yards and piled up, pierced on both sides. The hunt took place with Harry Claassens Safaris (27-16-34-95-6166; www.harrysafaris.co.za). a PH who has access to several properties and just about every variety of game throughout the southern half of Africa. Long about the sixth or seventh day of the hunt, he and I were talking about the lack of warthogs on the property we were hunting. It was decided then that I would take a ride with another PH the following morning to an agricultural area where warthogs had become pests to the local farmers. As soon as we pulled up to a dry riverbed that was several hundred yards wide running between two fields, we began seeing the stocky beasts scurrying around in the brush. We parked the safari car, I stoked up the High-Tech Customs .270, and we set out on foot. At first, most of the warthogs we stalked up on were small boars or sows with piglets. We waded through them, and about eight or nine pigs later we ran into a young boar that stood facing us at about 50 yards. Off shooting sticks, I placed the cross-wire right at the bottom of the boar's brisket and squeezed off a good shot. That boar turned and ran off into the brush with a cloud of white, powdery earth in its wake. Following closely behind it were our two trackers. In was unlike anything I'd ever seen. Warthogs, not unlike wild hogs here in this country, can take a bullet through the heart and still manage to cover 100 yards or more before they expire. Likewise, they don't often bleed very well, leaving little sign by which to track them. So while it was a sight to behold, watching our trackers run off through the brush was entertaining but totally understandable; the warthog made it at least 125 yards with a 150-grain A-Frame centered perfectly through its chest. Had I made the same shot with the .338, I doubt the outcome would have been any different. Even at 50 yards I wouldn't say that was an easy shot, which brings up another impressive point about the rifle: It flat-out shoots. I have yet to own a rifle other than this one that shoots so well with so many different bullets.

Just a couple of days ago I had it to the range to gather some more information for this story. Through it I shot some of the A-Frame handloads I had left over from Africa, a half-box of Federal Premiums loaded with 150-grain Nosier Partitions and a half-box of Homady Light Magnum 130-grain InterBonds. All three of them shot well under an inch at I 00 yards. I've also shot Winchester's 150-grain Partition Golds and handloaded 130-grain Swift Sciroccos through the rifle with similar results. The least-accurate loads I've shot through this rifleRemington Premier AccuTips-still managed an inch and a quarter and worked quite well on a wild hog I shot in California two summers back. The first shot was perfectly broadside at about 150 yards, but I hit the pig too far back. As it ran off toward the top of the ridge, I took a second shot and missed. Then the pig paused just shy of the top of the ridge, and a third shot anchored it where it stood. Follow-ups were critical after the first botched shot-the smooth stroke of the fluted bolt certainly helped me get them off quickly. Having shot a couple of his rifles over the years now, one thing that I have come to understand is that Rich Reiley is not a slap-them-together gunmaker. He's a shooter, a hunter and, above all, a perfectionist. He's not interested in assembly lines. He's only interested in making one rifle at a time and to have it work to the best of its abilities. He likes to build a basic rifle that is beyond basic in performance. And best of all, he'll build you exactly what you want, whether it's a monstrous .416 that weighs less than the average deer rifle or the perfect little .270 that you've been waiting for all your life. You decide what you want in a rifle; the only thing Reiley does is make it perform to your expectations.

Group of 3 muzzle brakes

 

When I first met Rich Reiley he told me that he was manufacturing and installing a muzzle brake that really worked. A local gunsmith, Dick Gish, started the development on this brake; with Rich doing the drawing and putting the final touches on. Dick said he got the idea from the brakes used by the military on their artillery pieces. I am not inexperienced in the area of firearms, quite the contrary, and I have used muzzle brakes in the past and I considered them to be all about the same. They vent off some of the gases perpendicular to the line of recoil to reduce recoil. But as a trade-off they really hurt your ears! They are very noisy!!
Rich informed me that not only does the High Tech Brake substantially reduce recoil, more than other brakes, but also it increases muzzle velocity and accuracy. He went on to say that this brake is built onto the weapon, not taken out of a box and the weapon made to fit the brake. This means that the brake is of the same taper and/or diameter as the barrel of the firearm it is installed on. He showed me his Remington Mountain Rifle with this brake and I was impressed with the quality and workmanship. When I found out the cost l was even more impressed.
I had the High Tech Brake installed on two Winchester Model 70's, a 30-06 and 338 Win Mag. When I received them from Rich I noted the same high quality workmanship on my rifles as he had done on his own. This tells me the man cares and takes pride in his work. The real proof is in the putting, in this case, the putting of the rifle to the shoulder. Well, I am here to tell you that I was very impressed, and I am a very critical person who is not easily impressed!! Not only was the recoil reduced, but it was drastically reduced. And unlike the KDF brake I have on my 35 Whelen, the muzzle blast (noise) did not appear to have increased! Noise is the single most stated reason for shooters to not want a brake on their firearm.
I have a dominant left eye so I shoot long guns left handed and have been shooting right handed bolt action rifles my entire life and could see no reason to change. Well, I fired a lefthanded rifle of a friend and was won over. l bought two left-handed Stainless Stalkers, 270 Win and a 338 Win Mag. I most definitely wanted the High Tech Brake on them but I saw an opportunity to prove or disprove the claims that the High Tech Brake increases velocity, increases accuracy, and is not very noisy. I tested both rifles for muzzle velocity and accuracy before the brakes were installed and after the brakes were installed. I tested these two rifles and the 30-06 I had the brake installed on earlier for the noise at the shooters ear with and without the brake in place. You will be amazed at the results of the tests. I was ... When you read these test results you will see that, in this case, "You can have your cake and eat it too." When you factor in the
cost, it is truly unbelievable!!

Velocity and Accuracy Test:

Equipment: Two new Browning Stainless Stalker Rifles, one in .270 Winchester with a 22 inch barrel and one in .338 Winchester Magnum with a 26 inch barrel. Both rifles were scoped with Leupold VXII 2x7 Matte scopes on Leupold bases and low rings. Both rifles were broken in with a shooting/cleaning/Tetragun treatment process. A Pact Professional Chronograph was used to record the velocities and compute information. The targets used were the High Tech "Red X" targets developed by Rich Reiley. The ammunition was all hand loaded using new brass that was sized, trimmed, chamfered, the flash holes deburred and the primer pockets uniformed. The bullets were alt Barnes "X", which is why the break-in and cleaning process is so critical. The primers were CCI BR-2 Bench rest primers from the same lot. The powders used were IMR, Hodgen, and Winchester and of the same respective lots. The powder was measured to the nearest I /10 of a grain by a Dillon digital scale. Ten rounds of ammo were loaded at the same setting, five rounds for use before and five rounds for after the brake was installed. Five separate loads for each rifle were used. This is 50 rounds per rifle, a total of 100 rounds for this velocity and accuracy test. I used the Hoppe's Expert Bench Rest and the respective rest bags filled with #8 lead shot, to shoot from the bench.

Conditions:

The temperatures range from 45 to 60 degrees F. The wind here never stops blowing so I had to pick days when the wind would slow to 15mph or less to shoot. In all fairness to the accuracy portion of the test, I must say that the shooting was conducted in less than ideal conditions. The wind conditions were worse for the second half of the test, when the brakes were tested.
All shooting was done from the bench, and targets were placed a measured l 00 yards from the bench. The chronograph was placed 10 feet in front of the muzzle.

Test Results:

.270 Winchester: The average velocity without the brake was 3,0 l 4.48fps. This is the average of all five loads fired. After Rich Reiley installed the High Tech Muzzle Brake, the average velocity was 3,054.20fps. This shows an average increase of39.72fps when the brake is added. This brake was added to the 22-inch barrel making the barrel slightly more that 23 inches total. The average group size without the brake was 1 .4 7 inches and the average group size after the
brake was installed was 1.56 inches. This is a .09 inch increase after the brake was installed. As stated earlier, the conditions for accuracy testing were less than ideal so I would say that that one is too close to call.
.338 Winchester Mag: The average velocity without the brake was 3,058.10. After the barrel was shortened 1 inch and the High Tech Muzzle Brake installed, the average velocity was 3,038.76. This would indicate that even after removing I inch from the barrel, the velocity is only reduced by l 9.34fps. The average group size without the brake was 3.25 inches. After the High Tech Brake was installed, the average group size was 2.32 inches. The addition of the brake reduced the group size by .93 inches.

Conclusion:

The High Tech Brake does increase muzzle velocity. The bullet is still accelerating while it is in the brake. If you take an inch off the barrel of a belted magnum you can generally figure you will lose between 50 and I 00fps depending on the load, but the loss in the .338 was only 19.34fps. The velocity gain of 39. 72fps in the .270 speaks for itself. The accuracy increase over an average of all groups fired in both calibers was .42 inches. Even if the less than ideal conditions are considered over the I 00 shots fired in this test I think this does show that the High Tech Muzzle Brake does increase accuracy. The winds were worse for the shooting after the brakes were installed, which should have decreased accuracy, but there was an increase in accuracy.

Noise Test:

Equipment: The test instrument used to measure the noise pressure was a GenRad, 1981 B Precision Sound Level Meter Ser# 1236 and it was placed in the Fast Response mode. Three rifles were used, the two Browning Stainless Stalkers, listed earlier, in .270 Winchester and .338 Winchester, and a Winchester Model 70 in 30-06. Without the brake installed the 270 has a 22- inch barrel, the 33 8 has a 25-inch barrel, and the 30-06 has a 21-inch barrel. The ammunition used was PMC Eldorado 130-grain factory loaded in the .270. The .338 ammo was a moderate velocity hand load using a 225-grain Barnes "X", and the 30-06 ammo was a high velocity hunting hand load using a 165 grain Barnes "X".

Conditions:

The test was conducted by a Colorado State Certified Audiometric Technician not affiliated to High Tech or Precision Ballistics. I did the actual firing of the rifles while the technician stood behind and to my left and measured the sound pressure at my left ear. Three shots were fired with each rifle with and without the High Tech Muzzle Brake installed. The Ambient (S.L.R.) noise level was 48.7 dBA.

Results:

The highest level recorded was I 16.2 dBA. This was the 30-06 without the brake installed. The lowest level recorded was 113 .5 dBA. This was the .33 8 without the muzzle brake installed.
The average of all nine shots fired with the muzzle brakes installed was 114.86 dBA and without the brake the average was 114.49dBA. This shows that there is literally no difference in the noise pressure levels with or without the High Tech Muzzle Brake installed. He explained that the instrument margin of error is .50 dBA, and the human ear cannot notice a change in sound pressure unless it exceeds .8 dBA. A 2-dBA increase is considered a "substantial" increase. Because sound pressure is measured on a logarithmic scale, it takes l O dBA to double the sound pressure level.

Conclusions:

The High Tech Muzzle Brake developed by Dick Gish and Rich Reiley; manufactured and installed by Rich Reiley works!! The only claim that is made by High Tech that I could not measure with a "number" is recoil. I can tell you that my 35 Whelen shooting a 225 grain bullet at 2600 fps in a Remington 700 with a KDF muzzle brake installed has more felt recoil and is considerably noisier than my 338 Winchester Magnum shooting a 225 grain bullet at 2960 fps in the lighter Browning Stainless Stalker. The .338 uses about I 6 grains more powder than the 35 Whelen does. This would indicate to me that the High Tech Brake does a much better job at lessening recoil than the KDF does, and it does not increase the noise to the shooter. I would say that my .338 recoils about like a 20-gauge shotgun and my .270 recoils like a light 22-250. When you consider the benefits of the High Tech Muzzle Brake you will notice that this muzzle brake does not have the negative drawbacks of other muzzle brakes on the market today.

  1. It is manufactured for your fireann, not just an add-on.
  2. The noise level is the same with or without the brake.
  3. The felt recoil is reduced more than any other of the brakes I have shot, and the muzzle rise or ''FLIP' is completely eliminated.
  4. There is a verifiable increase in muzzle velocity when the brake is installed.
  5. The accuracy is increased when the brake is installed.
  6. You have the option of easily and quickly removing or replacing the brake.
  7. The cost of the brake and installation is less than any other I have priced.
  8. The fact that Rich Reiley and Dick Gish care about you and your firearm means that you can expect and will receive first rate workmanship and service from them, as I did.
  9. The High Tech Brake can be made to order, as for a varmint rifle without the holes drilled in
    the bottom for shooting prone in a dusty environment.


At least in the world of muzzle brakes "You can have your cake and eat it too", thanks to the High Tech Muzzle Brake.
The complete test results are available on request.

Jim Rau, Retired police officer,